How mbrsng.
It must be pretty embarrassing getting sexually involved with a student if you're a teacher. I mean, apart from it BEING ILLEGAL AND EVERYTHING. I just want to know what exactly it is about getting stuck into some u-16 jailbait that turns once level-headed educators into COMPLETE FUCKING MORONS. Why do they get all misty-headed and foolhardy? Why do they become shuffle-toed smitten over someone who doesn't even know Mr.T? Worst of all, why do they demean themselves with teeny-type text messages?
Here are just a few from poor old addled Mark Andrew Hayes to his teenage princess:
Will MSG u at recess. Had better go now babe. GNite + norty dreams xxxx.
It's 'naughty'. N.a.u.g.h.t.y. Jesus, I hope he wasn't an English teacher.
Feel like spoiling you. Soz if that sounds corny 101.
At least this one has a pleasingly academic theme. Note: Corny 101 is not on the current VCE syllabus.
Smile. Uniform. Hint of CLEAVAGE!
I'm not sure if this is some kind of barked instruction or just a bit of overexcitement on Mark's behalf.
You looked very 'do-able' this morning …
What every girl wants to hear before her Chem prac.
Want next time both of us 2 b more relaxed. More time. Motel. Few drinks. Big BED. SPA. Would b nice. msg u 2moror. Sexydreams my sexy horny schoolgirl xxx.
See, this is the one that really sticks in my craw. And yes, it's a grown man saying filthy things to a child and isn't it hideous and let's cut off his penis etc. But WHY OH WHY HAS HE BEEN REDUCED TO SUCH A FOOL? Admittedly I'd probably prefer some of my late-night liquored-up saucy texts to stay out of the newspapers, but at least I spell correctly and punctuate. What on earth is he playing at with 'msg u 2moror'?
Some people need to read more.
464 days til the next election.
Comments
Oh Ms Fits, you are a very norty girl and you will have to be spanked.
I guess he's just trying to be down with the kids. As well as going down on the kids.
i always thought that there was a correlation between fuckwits and condensed english, now i can add paedophiles to that as well.
thanks fits
larson_b
sunshine on a cloudy day.
Mr Hayes' use of the teeny-texting style is part of the grooming process whereby the predator tries to diminish the age and power differences by communicating at the child's level.
As for wanting to screw a 15 year old, Mr Hayes has dropped his moral compass and stripped away Western society's social veneers that usually prevent fertile young women from being preyed upon by men of all ages.
OTOH, FKN MORON.
Couldn't agree with u mor MF.
nowledge of MrT is esential B4 dating and nortiness can start.
The Age reported yesterday that in one message he described "ejaculating all over himself".
Do u think he used the word "sprogged" or "jizzied" to describe this event?
I never understand the shortening of words in texts anyway... I would probably have replied "What the fuck are you saying moron?"
Although I maybe harsh in this matter.
Nah, fuckit!
OMG that is soooooo disgusting, I cannot even believe that a schoolgirl would even let her teacher touch her like that because that is GROSS and ILLEGAL. We had a teacher at our school and he was obviously ALWAYS trying to look down the girls dresses and he was SO GROSS but Sadie totally loved him in front of anyone else because she thinks she's so bad.
i think this is why i can't find myself a man - they're too busy wanking themselves stoopid over 'not-quite-legal" and kiddie-porn to even notice a 'mature' bird like me.
so yuck. feel sorry for his pregnant partner and the unborn child.
AH PITY THE FOO'!*
*but not as much as i'd like to smack the statutory rapist (yes, yes, i know it's a seppo term) upside the fucking head with something cricket-battish. cockwomble.
Will MSG u at recess
what every girl is just gagging to hear.
Oh my, I had the good "luck" of being involved, albeit (and thankfully) rather briefly, with the worst text messager in the world! He could not spell to save himself... eg "Just havin a shour. Meet me at the frount dor" and he ended every message with haha
What about if they're 18?
Um ..... my friend wants to know.
the haha always KILLS me, anon. WHAT IS SO FUCKING FUNNY, WISEY.
Fucked up.
Can I call on your knowledge of these things, from being trolled by Lee Harding fans and performing forensic analysis on the mangled letters youngsters (and people wanting to bone them) send to each other?
What is 1337? Or L33T?
Context is a hilarious post over at Sternezine, where he bags teenagers and that idiot from Carey who tried to hump Howard.
Sterne got a pile of visits from IP addresses in the eastern suburbs, leaving comments such as:
U R SO TOTLY GAY OLOL NUB EMO FAG GO CUT PLXS OMFG WHORE BTW STEEV IS A L33T PLAYA IRL AND IS NOT HIS FAULT SECURITY FAILED TO PUL AGGRO OFF MR HOWARD B4 HE GOT THERE
...and...
steve has some uber 1337 micro.
Uber 1337 Micro?
What is this, please explain? Or ignore, given i've taken a wee tangent to the fringes of the topic...
< Kevin Donnelly > Were they actual text messages? For a second I thought it was the comprehension section of the English exam. < /Kevin Donnelly >
Will MSG u at recess
Obviously he just wants to go for Chinese food with her.
He's no Humbert Humbert, is he? And can someone please answer Armaniac, I am from the wrong generation and have been wondering similarly.
1337 = L33T = LEET = Elite.
"Uber elite micro" would be some sort of Neitzchien reference, I'd hazard, from one of our well-educated leaders of tomorrow who can spell "Neitzchien".
I always use proper English in my text messages. I can't help it. And as I use predictive text all the time, (except when posting latin mottos in the wee hours), I often get quizzical responses to my insistence that I "dual your aunt"
I guess he's just trying to be down with the kids. As well as going down on the kids.
Pithy and perfect, Rowena.
Some people need to read more.
Oh, I think he was familiar with the works of Nabakov. Or not.
Thanks Buck Fudd. I F33l fat, wicked, and uber elite now.
It reminds me of the movie Election.
"feel sorry for his pregnant partner and the unborn child"
Yeah the rest of it was half funny half yech, but the aside about the partner and child just made me sad.
I agree, Armaniac. God knows what the woman thought when she discovered the truth.
Was he planning on making any money off of her?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101480.html?nav=rss_metro
Not that I am in any way defending the actions of a teacher sleeping with a student - it is clearly a gross misuse of the power and authority they have over students -and I agree with previous comments about slapping him/smacking him about the head with a cricket bat, but I don't think it can be described as paedophilia.
A 15 year old is sexually mature, and even though this situation is totally unacceptable because of the teacher/student relationship, in other societies and other times, people got married at 15. Not to their teachers, I hasten to add. Don't lynch me!
But if 15 is sexually mature, I really don't think this can be described as paedophilia. They're not a child, physically.
Again, I'm *not* saying it's acceptable.
Yes, but whilst it is sexually mature, I believe the law classifies anyone under the age of 16 as children.
Most girls are sexually mature at about 13. I was sexually mature at 11. Would that make it alright to do an 11yo? It would be in some cultures.
Not having a go. I understand you're not condoning it. Just putting a point forward.
Also, clicking on refresh does not seem to make the Friday Q&A appear.
Perhaps my computer is broken?
*drums fingers*
I believe there should be a distinction made b/w creative spelling, and that of tards. Norty... stoopid... noob... pwnd. Love the way they sound in my head. Msg speak on the other hand, just makes me feel irritable and scratchy, like an unfinished wank.
I like the Dutch and Swedish legal solutions to these questions.
Anyone can root at any age, but under the age of 18 only people within two years of age of each other can legally get sticky.
It means Leif and Anna can start to play as soon as the pitch is green, but Anna's teacher Magnus can't join in.
If I was him, I'd be more ashamed of my spelling being in the world's press, than for being a horny fucktard who should damn well know better.
Particularly with teacher/student relationships, the issue is not so much with maturity, but with authority. It's a clear abuse of power.
But it's still just fucked up.
even people within two years of each other can have a coercive situation going on.
so as a mother to a 9-year old i say
NO SEX UNTIL 21
Fits,
Long time lurker, first time question-asker.
A single friend of mine who subscribes to online dating sites to find her fun informed me that maybe I should have a look at a certain profile of a bloke in our area. When I did, I was horrified to find it was my live-in boyfriend, proclaiming his singledom and inviting 'fun girls' to contact him. We've been together for a year (the profile was created long after we had gotten together), and have thus far had a great relationship (so I thought). I don't understand why he would do this and now I don't know whether to confront him about it. It's been two months since he's accessed the site, but I've printed out his profile and sealed it in an envelope in my handbag. I've no idea if he's initiated contact with anyone.
My question is - do I just hand him the envelope over the dinner table and ask him to explain himself? Do I just end it all straight up and begin the process of dividing mutually collected assets and broken leases? Or do I ignore it completely and return to having blind faith in him and our relationship? (that one's rhetorical, obviously).
He has always banged on about trust and commitment, and how cheating is the worst possible thing ever. We are/were about to take a huge (moving interstate together) step together and now I'm simply floored.
Hi Ms Fits
Over the years of having a Hotmail account I've sort of detected trends in the subjects of spam and guessed that they're good indicaters of what people are into out in the community at that particular point in time. Rumanian viagra seemed to be big in about 2000 (lucky, I'd been dish-rag limp all that year up till then) and in 2002 there was an alleged abundance of single, attractive women in my neighbourhood keen to make friends with me (this, maybe not so worthwhile, if the results of my cold-calling efforts at the grocers were anything to go by).
Anyway, it's 2006 and Rolex ads start arriving and well, that's kind of nice. I can forget for a moment that my life hasn't exactly panned out like in the "When I was 17" song (professionally I really feel like I've been stuck in the first verse for freakin' ever). But just while the Rolex ads are giving me some sort of newfound sense of respectability a new theme develops and well here (finally)is where the question lies.
Since when was the volume of semen ejaculated a big deal or in some way one of the yardsticks of machismo? Actually, since when (apart from maybe when you needed to begat a son to work the plough) was it even considered good as opposed to bad? At the risk of sounding like an FM radio DJ, I must've missed that meeting. All these emails are getting through the filter with promises of cojones at bursting point and gallons of the stuff at the ready to "hose her down" (actually, when you look at that sentence, maybe it's a latino thing). Or is it in some way related to pornography? I don't look at the stuff as much as my spam content would suggest (obviously then Swiss precision would be the thing that really jazzes me) but I did see Boogey Nights and it hinted at the money-shot being some sort of application of a face mask so could this be it? Has a whole fad in sexual behaviour passed me by in much the same way buggery did (not to mention the fact that the only hairless snatch I've ever scene was I'm guessing, a really localised case of alopecia)? So tell me Ms Fits or members of the gallery, is less no longer more in the spoof stakes?
Comments are closed.